Talk:therefor
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Archaic[edit]
Therefor is archaic according to these posts:
- http://www.englishpage.com/forums/showpost.php?s=d65afc54a8c5ee3717e31c9bcd127109&p=15702&postcount=4
- http://newsgroups.derkeiler.com/Archive/Alt/alt.usage.english/2007-08/msg01507.html
/Tense 12:30, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
- I would disagree as, as the entry says, it is still used when writing law. Cdhaptomos 22:09, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
Why reference to "Therefore"?[edit]
Subsection "Adverb" (English): Why does it refer to "Therefore" and not "therefore" ("Therefore" does not exist here (although it did)). --Mortense (talk) 23:04, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
synonym of thereof?[edit]
Could some native speaker confirm whether it's a synonym of thereof? --Backinstadiums (talk) 11:07, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
- Therefor is not a synonym of thereof, for for is not a synonym of of. Therefor means "for such"; thereof means "of such". Multiple Mooses (talk) 03:30, 9 November 2023 (UTC)