Talk:xanological
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
RFV discussion — failed[edit]
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Equinox ◑ 01:05, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
- I think it is refering to (deprecated template usage) Xanadu - the early (only theoretical) hypertext system that became the world wide web. (We haven't got an entry for that yet) SemperBlotto 09:14, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
- Ah yes: "It is probably best to consider Nelson's xanological structure to be just an abstract idea, rather like the Turing machine" (The Register). I was thinking of the literary Xanadu (honest). But with only 60 Web results, including some irrelevances and foreign junk, I don't think this can pass. Equinox ◑ 14:56, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
- Deleted, though it's sad to lose an X word :) Equinox ◑ 14:53, 18 June 2009 (UTC)