Talk:zettaweber
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Equinox in topic RFV discussion — failed
RFV discussion — failed
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/48/Keep_tidy.svg/55px-Keep_tidy.svg.png)
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Another one of those mysterious scientific units that only Wiktionary and its foreign-language cousins know about. Equinox ◑ 01:22, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
- zettafarad and zettacoulomb seem equally neglected (while zettaton and zettasecond could probably scrape through). Equinox ◑ 01:26, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
- Deleted zettakatal zettacoulomb zettagray zettafarad zettahenry zettaweber zettabecquerel, which all have no evidence of usage as opposed to mention. (Adding -dictionary to a Google search cuts down the results dramatically.) But zettaton zettasecond zettahertz survived the cull, as there is some evidence of usage. Equinox ◑ 01:27, 24 June 2009 (UTC)