Template talk:defective
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Mglovesfun in topic deletion debate
Moved this to the non-PoS label because even taking the "different frame" comment made in March, it's still weird, and no other template in Category:Grammatical context labels use it. Circeus 15:38, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
deletion debate
[edit]The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process.
It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.
Defectiveness is a property of an inflection paradigm, not of a specific sense and therefore not a context. —CodeCat 19:43, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
- Even if there are verbs where some senses are defective and some aren't,
{{context|defective}}
should be good enough, right? After all the other senses will be using{{context|not defective}}
and not{{not defective}}
. Mglovesfun (talk) 19:55, 2 February 2013 (UTC) - But a verb might in one sense be conjugated defectively and in another not.—msh210℠ (talk) 18:36, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
- Yes it's possible, not sure if such a verb exists and with the same etymology.
{{context|defective}}
should be good enough if we're talking about very few verbs (so far, we have zero). Mglovesfun (talk) 15:06, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- Yes it's possible, not sure if such a verb exists and with the same etymology.