Glyph origin --> Etymology

Fragment of a discussion from User talk:Rua
Jump to navigation Jump to search

That applies to me reverting too, doesn't it? If we establish "Glyph origin" as the practice for characters, all character entries that currently use "Etymology" would have to be changed, not just the Chinese entries that the bot edited.

CodeCat23:19, 4 May 2016

Before, some entries had ===Glyph origin=== and ===Etymology=== as separate headers. Now both are appearing as separate ===Etymology=== headers. Before, we could easily target just ===Glyph origin=== in order to change that to whatever we decide is appropriate. Now, instead, we have to do more complex heuristics to decide which ===Etymology=== header to change.

Please revert Mewbot's changes in this regard.

‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig23:26, 4 May 2016

Ok, which entries do I need to revert?

CodeCat23:38, 4 May 2016

All of Mewbot's changes that turned ===Glyph origin=== into ===Etymology===.

‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig23:39, 4 May 2016

And which are those?

CodeCat23:49, 4 May 2016

I think I got them all. I looked at MewBot's edits to pages in Category:Han script characters.

suzukaze (tc)00:03, 5 May 2016

Thank you.

CodeCat00:11, 5 May 2016