Hello, welcome to Wiktionary, and thank you for your contribution so far. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- How to edit a page is a concise list of technical guidelines to the wiki format we use here: how to, for example, make text boldfaced or create hyperlinks. Feel free to practice in the sandbox. If you would like a slower introduction we have a short tutorial.
- Entry layout explained (ELE) is a detailed policy documenting how Wiktionary pages should be formatted. All entries should conform to this standard, the easiest way to do this is to copy exactly an existing page for a similar word.
- Our Criteria for inclusion (CFI) define exactly which words Wiktionary is interested in including, there is also a list of things that Wiktionary is not for a higher level overview.
- The FAQ aims to answer most of your remaining questions, and there are several help pages that you can browse for more information.
- We have discussion rooms in which you can ask any question about Wiktionary or its entries, a glossary of our technical jargon, and some hints for dealing with the more common communication issues.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wiktionarian! If you have any questions, bring them to the Wiktionary:Information desk, or ask me on my talk page. If you do so, please sign your posts with four tildes: ~~~~ which automatically produces your username and the current date and time.
P.S. I don't agree with this statement that you made at Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2009-06/Unified Serbo-Croatian:
- Opposition here, whether admittedly or not, and despite appearances in some cases, is at its core primarily motivated by these circumstances - not by a desire to improve the Wiktionary.
That may be true of a few of the "oppose" votes, but the great majority are concerned with issues such as neutrality and standards-compliance. I suspect (and hope) that the editors in question mostly find the nationalism distasteful, but don't see that as an issue that Wiktionary is equipped to take on.
(See also Wiktionary:Assume good faith.)
—RuakhTALK 15:56, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
- Perhaps one could speak of such "great majority" just a few days ago, but lots of these new opposing votes all seem to be canvassed. We should really have rules for voting, something like registered for more than 2 months, and having more than 500 edits in the last 2 months, and at least -1 profficiency in the language (or closely related language of the same family) the policy is being voted on. There is little point in letting "paratroopers" dictate the policy that shouldn't apply to them at all. When it becomes (relatively) controversial, it will regularly be abused, as it is now. --Ivan Štambuk 16:06, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
Perhaps I should've added "directly or indirectly" (and I will :). Even concerns on neutrality are caused primarily by the political mess down here, i.e. the "circumstances" I described. --DIREKTOR (TALK) 16:15, 21 July 2009 (UTC)