Wiktionary:Project - Cleanup of basic English entries

Definition from Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Replacement filing cabinet.svg This page is no longer active. It is being kept for historical interest.
No discussion is needed to revive this page; simply remove the {{inactive}} tag and bring it up to date.

Purpose[edit]

A collective effort to systematically go through the Basic English word list and ensure all these words are in the Wiktionary, in a decent condition.

Status[edit]

IN PROGRESS - Seems to have support in principle, some active support--Richardb 11:24, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Progress is to be reported in the project table
See talk page for discussions Wiktionary talk:Project - Cleanup of Basic English Words

Active Participants[edit]

  • dmh- enthusiastically running with it - well, he was, but does not seem to have recorded results in the table !
  • Eclecticology - This seems like a useful idea.
  • Richardb - slow steady knocking a word off at a time, starting with Q words, mostly done.
  • HiFlyer - Giving it the old college try ;-0 ..I have entered some {{BE-ready}} entries on the table manually. If that is wrong, someone slap my hand. There also seem to be quite a few that are BE-READY but not marked as such. I will try to get my vote in on those. Thanks --HiFlyer 16:35, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC).PS I have corrected my use of the uppercase-lowercase wiki template -- i.e. {{BE-ready}} not BE-READY ~~AJ
  • Yorktown1776 - Sounds like a good idea. Starting with C words.
  • EncycloPetey - Already working on time-related words, and plan to move on to people-related words next.
  • scs - An excellent idea, but (at the risk of the good being the enemy of the great) I'm going to sound like a real wimp by suggesting an intermediate, "sniff test" level of checking. Without necessarily taking the time to make sure every entry is perfect -- with a full etymology and flawless IPA punctuation and everything -- I'd like to at least check that, say, the definitions aren't laughably bad (as two I found at poker today were). I'll suggest a way of encapsulating this hypothetical "sniff test" below.

Basis of How this project is organised[edit]

  • The PROJECT TABLE has a line for each word of the Basic English word list.
  • Against each word is recorded a status. Usually One of :-
    • UNKNOWN - No one yet reports having checked the entry
    • MUSTY - dmh, please define
    • STUB - Stub only - mark word with template {{BE-stub}} - see category:BE-stub
    • WIP - Work in Progress - mark entry with template {{BE-wip}} - see category:BE-wip
    • READY - At least one person reckons entry is in good condition - mark word with template {{BE-ready}} see category:BE-ready
  • Corresponding to the intermediate statuses - {{BE-stub}}, {{BE-wip}}, {{BE-ready}} - the word will be categorized according to the status, and appear in the appropriate category list, as well as in the project table. Once it is OK, the BE-Xxxx category tag can be removed.
    • OK - Word has been voted as in good condition by at least 3 people.
    • Or some note indicating which parts are READY and which parts need further work.
      {{BE-TRrans}}, {{BE-Pron}}, {{BE-Etym}} are used to indicate a word needs work in one or more of the areas - Translations, Pronunciation, Etymology.
  • Every one is free to pick a word and work on it, then update the status accordingly.
  • The project is complete when every word on the list is flagged as OK.