homoiophone
English
Alternative forms
Etymology
homoi- (“similar”) + -o- + -phone (“sound”)
Pronunciation
- Lua error in Module:parameters at line 333: Parameter 1 should be a valid language or etymology language code; the value "RP" is not valid. See WT:LOL and WT:LOL/E. enPR: hŏmoiʹəfōn, IPA(key): /hɒˈmɔɪəfəʊn/
Noun
homoiophone (plural homoiophones)
- A word similar — but not identical — in pronunciation with another; compare homophone.
- 1886: Stephen Denison Peet [ed.], The American Antiquarian and Oriental Journal, volume 8, page 349 (Jameson & Morse)
- This was through the existence of homophones and homoiophones in a language, of words with the same or similar sounds, but with diverse significations.
- 1893: Johan Harold Josua Lindahl, Description of a Skull of Megalonyx Leidyi, page 56 (American Philosophical Society)
- This was through the existence of homophones and homoiophones, that is, of words with different meanings but the same or nearly the same sound.
- 1911, July 6th: Robert Seymour Bridges, Correspondence of Robert Bridges and Henry Bradley, 1900–1923, page 81 (The Clarendon Press)
- Have you any idea as to what ought to be done with what I believe you pepel call homophones or homoiophones. I hope that is not the right name for them. But is it not foolish to have an educated nation that refuses to readjust such inconveniences?
- 1924: American Oriental Society Journal of the American Oriental Society, volume 44, page 28
- By way of bringing this intricate and tedious dissertation to an end, allow me to recite a short specimen of the thing itself — a Siamese “jaw-breaker” which, for ingenious bewilderment by means of homoiophones, I am sure does not fall behind our “Theophilus Thistle the Thistle-sifter,” while in coloratura of intonation it certainly leaves that far behind.
- 1987: Alan Allport [ed.], Language Perception and Production: Relationships Between Listening, Speaking, Reading and Writing, page 237 (Academic Press; →ISBN, 9780120527502)
- Another explanation relates to the actual use of homophony-generating rules; perhaps pseudohomophones are not homophones but rather ‘homoiophones’, that is, phonologically similar but not exactly equal to their word mates.
- 1886: Stephen Denison Peet [ed.], The American Antiquarian and Oriental Journal, volume 8, page 349 (Jameson & Morse)