Category talk:Languages of Tibet
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Metaknowledge in topic RFD discussion: March 2018–February 2020
Deletion debate[edit]
The following information passed a request for deletion.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
This is not a sovereign country. -- Prince Kassad 16:59, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- I admire your bravery. I think. Mglovesfun (talk) 17:03, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- Keep it's a relatively well defined region, like Category:Languages of Asia. The genetic cats are for linguistics, but these geographic cats are probably more for the interest of casual users. Therefore I think Tibet fits the bill (why limit it just sovereign countries?). This sort of applies above to the Papuan one. --Bequw → τ 04:21, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Note that Papuan languages above is not geographical by nature. Also, I'm fearing this may be a precedent for creating, say, Category:Languages of East Turkestan, Category:Languages of Transnistria, Category:Languages of South Ossetia, Category:Languages of Tuva, Category:Languages of Andhra Pradesh, etc. and I don't think we want these. -- Prince Kassad 07:58, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- What’s sovereignty got to do with it? If a distinct part of country has a distinct linguistic identity, why not Category:Languages of Alaska or Category:Languages of Nunavut? — Robin 14:20, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
Kept: Few people, no consensus. --Daniel. 14:35, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
The following information passed a request for deletion (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Small category with little potential to grow as we already unified most languages of Tibet.--Zcreator alt (talk) 15:24, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. This is generated automatically by
{{langcatboiler}}from manually-entered parameters, and there are lots of small categories- why delete just this one? Besides: even though the vast majority speak Tibetan, I would be very surprised if there weren't a fair number of small Tibeto-Burman languages scattered here and there. Chuck Entz (talk) 05:56, 7 March 2018 (UTC) - Keep. Ultimateria (talk) 00:02, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
- RFDO-kept. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 06:24, 24 February 2020 (UTC)