User talk:Sawbackedeagle

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Equinox in topic Aircraft
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hello, welcome to Wiktionary, and thank you for your contributions so far.

If you are unfamiliar with wiki-editing, take a look at Help:How to edit a page. It is a concise list of technical guidelines to the wiki format we use here: how to, for example, make text boldfaced or create hyperlinks. Feel free to practice in the sandbox. If you would like a slower introduction we have a short tutorial.

These links may help you familiarize yourself with Wiktionary:

  • Entry layout (EL) is a detailed policy on Wiktionary's page formatting; all entries must conform to it. The easiest way to start off is to copy the contents of an existing same-language entry, and then adapt it to fit the entry you are creating.
  • Check out Language considerations to find out more about how to edit for a particular language.
  • Our Criteria for Inclusion (CFI) defines exactly which words can be added to Wiktionary; the most important part is that Wiktionary only accepts words that have been in somewhat widespread use over the course of at least a year, and citations that demonstrate usage can be asked for when there is doubt.
  • If you already have some experience with editing our sister project Wikipedia, then you may find our guide for Wikipedia users useful.
  • If you have any questions, bring them to Wiktionary:Information desk or ask me on my talk page.
  • Whenever commenting on any discussion page, please sign your posts with four tildes (~~~~) which automatically produces your username and timestamp.
  • You are encouraged to add a BabelBox to your userpage to indicate your self-assessed knowledge of languages.

Enjoy your stay at Wiktionary! Conrad.Irwin 20:02, 22 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Aircraft

[edit]

Hello there. I only just saw your comment on sexfid (supposedly meaning "split into six"?) because I happened to look at your contribution history; if you want to get someone's attention, the best way is to leave a message on their talk page. About the aircraft names you are adding: these may not be suitable material for a dictionary, because they are something like specific "brand names" rather than generic words. See WT:CFI#Brand_names. Equinox 20:39, 22 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Gotcha! sorry bout that --Sawbackedeagle 20:41, 22 January 2009 (UTC) I won't add anymore.Reply
I've now flagged them for deletion. Again, I know they are real aircraft and you added them in good faith, but this is a dictionary, not an encyclopaedia. You can find the deletion discussion here: WT:RFD#Messerschmitt_109.2C_Focke-Wulf_190 Equinox 00:04, 26 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

field of fire

[edit]

Might be worth having. I did a prefix search and we already have field of force, field of honor, field of study, field of view. The last two are sort of obvious from their parts, but in a way they're set phrases as well. So... I wouldn't exactly object to this one, personally. You could take it to the WT:Tea_room if you want to get a few opinions, or just add it and see whether anyone dislikes it enough to RFD. Equinox 20:51, 22 January 2009 (UTC)Reply