User talk:Trooper57

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome Message[edit]

Welcome[edit]

Hello, welcome to Wiktionary, and thank you for your contributions so far.

If you are unfamiliar with wiki-editing, take a look at Help:How to edit a page. It is a concise list of technical guidelines to the wiki format we use here: how to, for example, make text boldfaced or create hyperlinks. Feel free to practice in the sandbox. If you would like a slower introduction we have a short tutorial.

These links may help you familiarize yourself with Wiktionary:

  • Entry layout (EL) is a detailed policy on Wiktionary's page formatting; all entries must conform to it. The easiest way to start off is to copy the contents of an existing same-language entry, and then adapt it to fit the entry you are creating.
  • Check out Language considerations to find out more about how to edit for a particular language.
  • Our Criteria for Inclusion (CFI) defines exactly which words can be added to Wiktionary; the most important part is that Wiktionary only accepts words that have been in somewhat widespread use over the course of at least a year, and citations that demonstrate usage can be asked for when there is doubt.
  • If you already have some experience with editing our sister project Wikipedia, then you may find our guide for Wikipedia users useful.
  • If you have any questions, bring them to Wiktionary:Information desk or ask me on my talk page.
  • Whenever commenting on any discussion page, please sign your posts with four tildes (~~~~) which automatically produces your username and timestamp.
  • You are encouraged to add a BabelBox to your userpage to indicate your self-assessed knowledge of languages.

Enjoy your stay at Wiktionary! --Apisite (talk) 21:45, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WT:EL- no Portuguese entry is complete without a headword template. Chuck Entz (talk) 21:33, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tupi antigo[edit]

Hey, você aprende tupi antigo, ou é só mais uma língua para cujas palavras você cria entradas aqui no Wiktionary? Saudações, RodRabelo7 (talk) 18:06, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oi, comecei a estudar recentemente. O que adicionei aqui a maioria foi para completar a etimologia de algumas palavras em português, mas parei por enquanto por ainda não haver predefinições próprias da língua como um ''tpw-noun''. Trooper57 (talk) 20:50, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Há alguns Wikimedistas interessados pelo assunto, como o Bageense. Hoje mesmo criei o artigo Le langaige du Bresil na Wikipédia anglófona. Somos poucos, mas existimos. Agradeço-lhe suas contribuições por aqui. RodRabelo7 (talk) 20:55, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

both é uma palavra tupi antiga? Me parece que não. PierreAbbat (talk) 04:25, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

era pra ser "opá", marquei errado Trooper57 (talk) 04:34, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

+rhyme -aɾti[edit]

Please, before adding the rhymes in the pronunciation category, pay attention to how this is placed in the IPA template, I saw that you put the wrong rhyme in several entries, which can/could cause a lot of headaches later on. Stríðsdrengur (talk) 12:19, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I just don't see the point of adding a rhyme for every different pronunciation if they are all allophones and are going to be redirected to the same page in the end. There's only a real difference in things like /aw/ and /al/ and words with sound elision.
Choosing the most "neutral" rhyme and redirecting the others to it has been the standard procedure for Portuguese rhymes for some time now. Trooper57 (talk) 13:11, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hunsrik[edit]

Hi Trooper, I saw that you've been editing Hunsrik lately, I really liked them and thanks for contributing. I was wondering if you would like to help me correct several old pages of poor quality, because they are many and I am only one person for all of them, just a request, if you recur I will understand :) Stríðsdrengur (talk) 16:26, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I can help organizing the templates, but I'm not a fluent Hunsrik speaker myself. Trooper57 (talk) 16:29, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not a fluent speaker either, I'm mostly helped by Piter Keo, all we need to do is just collect the information from his dictionary and apply it to Wiktionary, such as etymologies, pronunciations, meanings and derived terms Stríðsdrengur (talk) 16:32, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok then. I'll gladly help. Trooper57 (talk) 16:35, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ty :) Stríðsdrengur (talk) 16:35, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Trooper57 I'm stopping by again to thank you once more for your amazing work, I've been really busy lately and haven't had time to do anything about Hunsrik and I was really distressed about it, thank you so much! :) Stríðsdrengur (talk) 00:32, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thx. Also, I wanted to ask your opinion on {{hrx-ndecl-m}} et al. Are they really necessary? Hunsrik doens't seem to have noun declension, so the table just shows the same singular and plural forms of the headline. Trooper57 (talk) 00:38, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The nouns in Hunsrik don't really decline, I debated with Piter Keo about this, he said it wasn't necessary to have inflection tables but I just keep them to give it a "German feel" Stríðsdrengur (talk) 00:41, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This has been in CAT:E for a few days because the documentation page you added and the module seem to disagree about parameter |3=. Please take a look. Thanks! Chuck Entz (talk) 01:38, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I've deleted parameter 3 in the module and forgot to update the documentation.
I think we could just merge it with {{hrx-conj-regular}} and tell it's iregular with |irreg=1 or something, but I don't wanna mess with this know. Trooper57 (talk) 02:00, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Por seu incansável trabalho com o tupi antigo! RodRabelo7 (talk) 10:08, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Para registro, há uma versão facilmente consultável do dicionário do Navarro aqui. O DOC pode ser encontrado em algum lugar, se desejar eu procuro… RodRabelo7 (talk) 10:12, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Não precisa, eu consulto pelo doc disponível no Internet Archive. Até coloquei o link na predefinição {{R:pt:Navarro 2013}}.
Obrigado pela medalha. Trooper57 (talk) 20:41, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pedido[edit]

Olá, pode revisar os verbetes que estou a criar, nomeadamente karukasy e emirekó? Cumprimentos, RodRabelo7 (talk) 15:47, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Também emirekoeté e mo'em. Este último é meio complicado, porque pelo que vi não há template para verbos pluriformes de segunda classe. Eu mesmo pouco sei do Wiktionary, então não me garanto nem de longe criando um template. RodRabelo7 (talk) 16:40, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Estava pensando em traduzir os verbos da 2ª classe como adjetivos. Nunca entendi a lógica por trás de tratar eles como verbos, sendo que se comportam totalmente como adjetivos. Acho a ideia até um pouco lusocêntrica levando em conta a explicação do Navarro.
Sobre os pluriformes, até pensei em adicionar na template que temos, mas ia ficar uma bagunça. O mais prático seria converter pra um módulo, mas não sei mexer em Lua. Trooper57 (talk) 16:54, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Aproveitando o gancho, te marquei numa discussão sobre adicionar as Línguas Gerais no Wikcionário, não sei se você viu Wiktionary:Beer parlour/2024/March#Adding "Língua Geral" as a new language. Trooper57 (talk) 17:01, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Guarani v Guaraní[edit]

Olá,

Sabe por que o Wiktionary usa Guaraní, com acento? Particularmente prefiro sem, mas as predefinições ainda chamam a versão acentuada. É possível buscar consenso para mover os Guaranís para Guarani? Facilitava a vida, e em inglês imagino que a versão sem diacrítico seja a mais comum, vide a própria página na Wikipédia anglófona. Aliás, algumas páginas usam gug em vez de gn. Tem ideia do porquê (ainda que aquele seja mais específico do que este, imagino eu)?

Cumprimentos, RodRabelo7 (talk) 01:19, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vamos por partes:
  1. O acento deve vir do espanhol, o guarani não acentua oxítonas. A página foi criada em 2005 já acentuada.
  2. Já tentam buscar esse consenso desde 2016. Até trouxeram a discussão de volta no Discord um tempo atrás, mas ainda nada.
  3. Eu não entendo muito do guarani, mas acho que é o mesmo que acontece com o tupi: criaram categorias tanto pro termo genérico (Old Tupi), quanto pros específicos (Tupinambá, Tupinikin) e agora ambos são tratados como línguas separadas. Levei isso pro WT:RFM, mas também não foi muito longe.
Sinceramente, o guarani no Wiktionary tá uma bagunça tão grande que eu não sei se quero me meter. Trooper57 (talk) 02:29, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]