Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2008-09/User:FitBot for bot status

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Jump to navigation Jump to search

User:FitBot for bot status[edit]

  • Vote ends: 18 September 2008 23:59 UTC
  • Vote started: 23:39, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Support[edit]

  1. Support Conrad.Irwin 23:41, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support Ivan Štambuk 23:44, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support Nadando 23:47, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support -Atelaes λάλει ἐμοί 01:09, 12 September 2008 (UTC) (As long as it's writing for us, and not for Wikipedia ;-))[reply]
  5. Oh, hell yes. Bring on the Latin. bd2412 T 05:36, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Support —Stephen 14:03, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Support (and you might consider taking over French verbs from Keenebot) SemperBlotto 15:40, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Support Robert Ullmann 15:54, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    "FitBot"? (starts quivering) ... "must sit on floor!" (gasps for air) ... (restores roflcopter, complete with ASCII art) ... (regresses:) "mommy mommy, I found a BOT! can I keep it" "Um, What's its name?" "MtbfBot!" "Okay, only if you feed it." (Ahem. resumes chair) Robert Ullmann 15:54, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Ooh, bringing the ASCII art back would be good, the commons people said I couldn't upload it because I didn't have permission from the original author... Conrad.Irwin 22:19, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Support Bequw¢τ 17:31, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  10. SupportRuakhTALK 01:45, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Support Wikiacc () 22:12, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Support H. (talk) 14:43, 15 September 2008 (UTC) Although I’d rather see discussions on the formatting of that sort of content settled first. {{conjugation of}} is rather primitive, so it seems? What’s with Wiktionary:Form-of templates?[reply]
    It's hard to settle discussions that don't happen. I've already held off more than three years on creating entries for inflected Latin forms, and in that time no serious discussion was ever carried through to conclusion. I'd rather not wait another three years only to find there is still no concensus. Each language has its own peculiar system of doing things; Spanish, Italian, Finnish, Latin, English are all different. I use {{conjugation of}} because of its versatility and because it is potentially possible for users to customize display if we limit our templates. I have been using it for more than two years now, with no concerns from anyone other than the issues of capitalization and punctuation. The page you mention was a DAVilla initiative that died quietly. --EncycloPetey 20:09, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Support.—msh210 16:14, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Support Medellia 22:05, 16 September 2008 (UTC) I can't tell you just how happy this makes me.[reply]
  15. Support --Panda10 22:22, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Support Williamsayers79 11:58, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose[edit]

Abstain[edit]

Decision[edit]