Appendix talk:Arora surnames
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Kutchkutch in topic RFD discussion: November–December 2021
The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process (permalink).
It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.
·~ dictátor·mundꟾ 16:19, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Inqilābī Does this deletion request extend to other appendices in Category:Surname appendices such as Appendix:Indian surnames (Arora) and:
- ?
- Appendix_talk:Indian_surnames_(Arora)#Deletion_debate was RFD kept in 2010.
- Appendix talk:Indian surnames (Deshastha Brahmin) failed RFD in 2012 - 2013 but was apparently restored.
- Kutchkutch (talk) 14:03, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Kutchkutch: Oh, I did not know there are so many of these. I think these appendices are unnecessary, and the only thing that we should be creating is new dictionary entries for surnames (and given names). A list of surnames (not in category form) would hardly help us in creating new entries, because the editors working in a particular language would already be knowing what surnames to create. Furthermore, dividing this list by literally caste seems unproductive, as we do not mention caste (or religion) in our entries. Finally, we do not know if the spellings or the names in these lists are reliable, and some people may even be relying on them to create new entries. Thus, these appendices are useless that we should get rid of, since they serve no purpose. ·~ dictátor·mundꟾ 17:14, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
- RFD-deleted Inqilābī Should Category:English_surnames_from_India be deleted as well? (see Wiktionary:Requests_for_cleanup#Category:English_surnames_from_India Kutchkutch (talk) 20:01, 2 December 2021 (UTC)