Reconstruction talk:Latin/auca
- While I can't comment on the other possibilities below, auca is attested, not a reconstruction. Please see the long listing in the DMLBS.
3charles3 (talk) 19:13, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
Possible additions:
Ligurian: öca
http://www.zeneize.net/itze/parole.asp?Parola=OCA
Piedmontese: òca
https://www.piemonteis.com/dizionario-italiano-piemontese.php?parola=oca
Romagnol: oca
https://archive.org/stream/vocabolarioromag00ercouoft#page/280/mode/2up/search/oca
Sadinian: Campidanese: accoca, coca Logudorese: coca, oca, oga Nuorese: oca
Greenismean2016 (talk) 04:41, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process (permalink).
It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.
Attested (see the DMLBS); moved to auca by Brutal Russian on 4 November 2020 (edit summary: “attested Latin moved from Vulgar Latin”). 3charles3 added the Dictionnaire illustré Latin-Français and the DMLBS as references and removed {{reconstructed}}, then wrote on the talk page “While I can't comment on the other possibilities below, auca is attested, not a reconstruction. Please see the long listing in the DMLBS.” Also pinging @Nicodene (who worked on Latin reconstructions). J3133 (talk) 19:50, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, no need at all for a reconstruction page. Should be either deleted entirely or replaced with a redirect to auca. Nicodene (talk) 20:00, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
- Deleted because yes, if it's attested there's no need to also reconstruct it. The following content was present in the reconstruction page but not the entry auca: at the start of the etymology "From earlier *avica", in the references section "Dictionary of Medieval Latin in British Sources". The descendants were also presented in a different order (grouped by linguistic relationship in the reconstruction page). - -sche (discuss) 18:40, 15 March 2022 (UTC)