Reconstruction talk:Proto-Malayo-Polynesian/payuŋ
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Metaknowledge in topic RFD discussion: October–December 2021
The following information passed a request for deletion (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Reconstruction:Proto-Malayo-Polynesian/bahaq[edit]
The entry has three descendants now. –Austronesier (talk) 11:06, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Reconstruction:Proto-Malayo-Polynesian/saləʀ[edit]
The entry has three descendants now. –Austronesier (talk) 11:08, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Reconstruction:Proto-Malayo-Polynesian/payuŋ[edit]
Lots of descendants now, added by @Wiktionarian89. –Austronesier (talk) 11:14, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Reconstruction:Proto-Malayo-Polynesian/daʀat[edit]
Three descendants now, added by @Wiktionarian89 and me. –Austronesier (talk) 11:14, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Reconstruction:Proto-Malayo-Polynesian/suluq[edit]
This entry has descendants now. –Austronesier (talk) 11:18, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Kutchkutch (talk) 14:25, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep all, @Wiktionarian89 and I have added descendants to these entries. @Rajkiandris (the creator of the entries): ideally, reconstructed lemmas should have descendants comprising already existing lemmas from the start. Without them, they are just unattested constructs. –Austronesier (talk) 11:24, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
- The initial issue has been resolved since they now have descendants added by users who work in this area. (@Austronesier, Wiktionarian89) Kutchkutch (talk) 12:05, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
- RFD resolved. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 04:13, 4 December 2021 (UTC)