Talk:'ookin'
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Equinox in topic RFV
RFV
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/48/Keep_tidy.svg/55px-Keep_tidy.svg.png)
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Also 'its and 'ook (verb). All are questionable, as are some of the lemma forms --Mat200 03:58, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
- Now tagged 'its and 'ook so that this nomination can be found.—msh210℠ (talk) 19:18, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
- Easy to attest the noun sense of 'ookby searching google books:+"by ook or by". I suspect the others will be as easy if someone can think of a similarly indicative collocation.—msh210℠ (talk) 19:23, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
- Eye dialect spellings of aitchless pronunciations seem likely to be common in fiction. Do we really have to cite them in every PoS? Noun 'ook is cited, IMHO. DCDuring TALK 21:08, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
- Failed RFV. Equinox ◑ 00:01, 9 July 2011 (UTC)