Talk:Întèrnet
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Gamren in topic RFV discussion: September 2017–January 2018
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Norman. Can't find anything in Google Books. Wikipedia has an article about this for nrm:enternette, and I can't seem to find that anywhere on Books either. PseudoSkull (talk) 22:58, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
- @ User:Embryomystic What do you have to say? PseudoSkull (talk) 17:22, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
- I don't specifically remember adding this, but most of my Norman contribution are from a small set of websites aimed at promoting Jèrriais, and I've been challenged on them in the past, which is mainly why I don't tend to add new Norman entries. If its non-presence on Google Books seems like justification enough to remove the entry entirely, then go ahead. The fact that someone fluent enough to create a stub has done so with a Continental Norman word would seem to indicate that enternette is used to at least some degree, and it's nice of them to also reference the Jersey form, but you're going to have a hard time, across the board, finding citations for vocabulary, especially technological vocabulary, in minoritised languages that are, for better or worse, as close to an existing standard language as Norman is to French. embryomystic (talk) 20:43, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
- RFV failed.__Gamren (talk) 19:01, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- I don't specifically remember adding this, but most of my Norman contribution are from a small set of websites aimed at promoting Jèrriais, and I've been challenged on them in the past, which is mainly why I don't tend to add new Norman entries. If its non-presence on Google Books seems like justification enough to remove the entry entirely, then go ahead. The fact that someone fluent enough to create a stub has done so with a Continental Norman word would seem to indicate that enternette is used to at least some degree, and it's nice of them to also reference the Jersey form, but you're going to have a hard time, across the board, finding citations for vocabulary, especially technological vocabulary, in minoritised languages that are, for better or worse, as close to an existing standard language as Norman is to French. embryomystic (talk) 20:43, 3 September 2017 (UTC)