Talk:Τεφνέτ
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Surjection in topic RFV discussion: March–June 2019
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Both extremely unlikely for the same reasons as #Σεκμέτ above. Also suspicious to my eyes, but at least more plausible, are Σεθ (Seth) and Ῥα (Rha). — Vorziblix (talk · contribs) 01:59, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
- There's no reason to trust those any more, seeing as they're all by the same highly problematic anon, and they're no more difficult to verify, seeing that AGr. dictionaries should be essentially comprehensive, so I've added those two you mentioned to this RFV. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 16:38, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
- RFV-failed — surjection ⟨?⟩ 18:12, 19 June 2019 (UTC)