Talk:блия

@Bezimenen, Useigor I can fix the module to recognize verbs in -ия of type 1.6, but are we sure this type is correct and it's not of type 1.7? Benwing2 (talk) 06:25, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

@Benwing2 I'm not familiar with Bulgarian language. Judging by Template:bg-conj, 1.6 and 1.7 differ in aorist stress but Nayden Gerov did not provide aorist forms (only present: бли́я, бли́ешъ, бли́е), so i don't see how they can be distinguished. —Игорь Тълкачь (talk) 09:15, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

@Benwing2: I can't tell the aorist as well. It could be, judging from крия (krija) (< *kryti), however, the Serbian infinitive points towards ja-aorist. I checked Българска диалектология, but there only the present is given as well. Безименен (talk) 13:13, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

@Benwing2: On a second note, I found the correspondance Bulgarian брия (brija, “to shave”) : Serbo-Croatian бријати (“id.”), so the ja-aorist could be a Serbo-Croation innovation. In that case, though, the proto-Slavic form should be *blyti instead. Безименен (talk)

@Bezimenen, Useigor User:Chuck Entz fixed the error by using {{rfinfl}}. I think this is reasonable; maybe we should add a usage note specifying the present tense and indicating that the aorist is unknown. Benwing2 (talk) 02:03, 7 January 2022 (UTC)