Talk:пшек

@Shumkichi Hi. The reference that you have provided in diff doesn't have the term. It's linked to "пек". --Anatoli T. ^{(обсудить}/^вклад) 04:16, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

If you really need a dictionary reference, "Большой синонимический словарь русского языка. Речевые эквиваленты" by А. Ю Кожевников has it. --Anatoli T. ^{(обсудить}/^вклад) 04:19, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

@Atitarev Then add it yourself. Shumkichi (talk) 04:20, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

@Shumkichi: I didn't think the term was worth and we don't have a template linking to that dictionary but since you started, I gave you the dictionary where I found it. --Anatoli T. ^{(обсудить}/^вклад) 04:25, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

@Atitarev So stop wasting my time if you're not gonna add it yourself. What does it even mean, "the term was [not] worth it"? In linguistics, no word is more "important" than others, lol. Shumkichi (talk) 04:29, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Oh, the problem is that it's a derogatory term for Poles, huh? Shumkichi (talk) 04:31, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

@Atitarev It's worth adding any source, even if the word is not yet in the dictionary, as it may be added later. Shumkichi (talk) 04:19, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Normally, I don't like creating new reference template, as I lack the skill and the patience. So, if a word is missing in dictionaries we already have templates for, a citation is an easier choice for me. @Vahagn Petrosyan, are you able to help, please with a new ref. template? I will come back to it, if no-one does. --Anatoli T. ^{(обсудить}/^вклад) 04:25, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

It is found in Elistratov, for which we already have a template. Vahag (talk) 10:56, 10 May 2022 (UTC)