Talk:सग्ळे

@माधवपंडित Are you sure this is from सकल (sakala)? The Prakrit form is Lua error in Module:parameters at line 95: Parameter 1 should be a valid language or etymology language code; the value "pmh" is not valid. See WT:LOL and WT:LOL/E.... —Aryaman ^{(मुझसे बात करो)} 13:30, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Aryamanarora I'm quite certain it is. It could be a borrowing from Sanskrit at any stage of Konkani's development, and then evolved in such a manner. DerekWinters (talk) 14:25, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@DerekWinters: So a semi-tatsama? That's cool. Thanks! —Aryaman ^{(मुझसे बात करो)} 14:27, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And I've seen the term ardhatatsam used in the literature, of we want to specify here on Wikt. DerekWinters (talk) 14:30, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@DerekWinters: Oh yeah, I believe I've heard that term before. We could if it seems useful. —Aryaman ^{(मुझसे बात करो)} 14:43, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Aryamanarora, DerekWinters: Yep, the form makes a derivation from सकल (sakala) obvious. Variants of this word is also found in Old Marathi which would date this tatsama at at least 150 years old. ɱɑɗɦɑѵ (talk) 08:27, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Navigation menu