Talk:มะฃาม

2016 deletion discussion

The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process.

It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.

---

มะฃาม

Reason for deletion request: There has never been such a spelling. --iudexvivorum (talk) 14:38, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

@Iudexvivorum, Alifshinobi: If you don't believe it existed, then WT:RFV is where this should go. If you both agree that it was created in error, though, I suppose we can just delete it. Nothing at google books:"มะฃาม" is relevant? —Μετάknowledge^{discuss/deeds} 21:00, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for your advice. As it is found at Google books, I hereby withdraw the request. I previously googled it but found nothing, except an alternative spelling (หมากฃาม) of its origin (หมากขาม) at a stele created in 1292/93. Sorry for any inconvenience I caused. --iudexvivorum (talk) 08:01, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

He said nothing at Google Books. Renard Migrant (talk) 12:00, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

There's something relevant at GB. So I withdrew the request. --iudexvivorum (talk) 15:42, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

I just don't know whether the shortening of หมาก to มะ occured before or after obsoletion of ฃ. If มะ occured before ฃ event, so มะฃาม could have existed. --Octahedron80 (talk) 05:56, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

@Alifshinobi, Iudexvivorum I created this a long time ago (in 2008); so, I do not remember why I created it. I may have found this spelling from the Thai wikipedia article on ฃ. I have looked at the Thai article again and did not see that there were references for this particular word with this particular spelling. --A.S. (talk) 09:42, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Deleted: I see a consensus for deletion, especially since the original creator now says he or she cannot find the source for it. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:09, 27 July 2016 (UTC)