Talk:小黄人
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Justinrleung in topic RFV discussion: August 2022
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/03/Green_check.svg/55px-Green_check.svg.png)
This entry has survived Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so.
- Discussion moved from Wiktionary:Requests_for_deletion/CJK#小黄人.
Chinese.
===Noun===
{{zh-noun}}
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minions%20(Despicable%20Me) Minion]
WT:FICTION —Fish bowl (talk) 00:42, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
- If kept, formatting must be fixed, including usage of 黄 instead of 黃 in the page title. —Fish bowl (talk) 00:47, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. Theknightwho (talk) 00:55, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Moved from RFD to RFV. —Fish bowl (talk) 01:19, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
- Isn't this RFD on the basis of WT:FICTION? I'm sure it can be verified under the updated attestation criteria, but what's the point? Theknightwho (talk) 03:55, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Theknightwho: Sometimes when I put things in RFD, people move it to RFV. IDK. Should I move it back? —Fish bowl (talk) 05:27, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Fish bowl, Theknightwho: I think WT:FICTION is best dealt with here. I do think this seems easy to verify, though. (Not sure which updated attestation criteria you're referring to, Theknightwho.) — justin(r)leung { (t...) | c=› } 05:42, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Justinrleung I mean the recent change re non-durably archived sources. Theknightwho (talk) 05:44, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Theknightwho: Okay, but I don't think this is hard to cite even with durably archived sources. — justin(r)leung { (t...) | c=› } 05:51, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Justinrleung Do you mean stuff like this?
激发粉丝的好奇心是每个跨界合作项目需要认真考虑的,就像麦当劳与小黄人的合作。率先推出小黄人套餐并发售小黄人玩具引发了消费者强烈的好奇心,他们纷纷去店里购买小黄人套餐并合。
I guess it's the same kind of thing as our entry at Hogwarts. Theknightwho (talk) 06:05, 1 August 2022 (UTC)- @Theknightwho: Yeah, exactly. — justin(r)leung { (t...) | c=› } 06:16, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Justinrleung Do you mean stuff like this?
- @Theknightwho: Okay, but I don't think this is hard to cite even with durably archived sources. — justin(r)leung { (t...) | c=› } 05:51, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Justinrleung I mean the recent change re non-durably archived sources. Theknightwho (talk) 05:44, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Fish bowl, Theknightwho: I think WT:FICTION is best dealt with here. I do think this seems easy to verify, though. (Not sure which updated attestation criteria you're referring to, Theknightwho.) — justin(r)leung { (t...) | c=› } 05:42, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Theknightwho: Sometimes when I put things in RFD, people move it to RFV. IDK. Should I move it back? —Fish bowl (talk) 05:27, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
- This should be cited. @Fish bowl, please check the quotes at Citations:小黃人. — justin(r)leung { (t...) | c=› } 06:24, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
- RFV passed. — justin(r)leung { (t...) | c=› } 19:27, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d5/TK_archive_icon.svg/55px-TK_archive_icon.svg.png)
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for deletion (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
- Discussion moved to Wiktionary:Requests_for_verification/CJK#小黄人.