Talk:節瓜
Latest comment: 10 years ago by 204.11.184.222 in topic No Cantonese romanization
No Cantonese romanization[edit]
If this is a Cantonese term, Cantonese romanization should be given in the entry. 204.11.184.222 13:45, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
- See Talk:老番. The romanisation is "zit3 gwaa1". There won't be "==Cantonese==", "==Mandarin==" soon, just "==Chinese==" at Wiktionary. Please bear with us. Most Cantonese terms can be used by Mandarin speakers as a loanword, so Pinyin should be there as well. --Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 23:36, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
Like this:
Wyang (talk) 23:48, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
If this is not a Mandarin term (as I believe it is not), listing it under a "Mandarin" heading and not a "Cantonese" heading is ridiculous and wrong. 204.11.184.222 16:24, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
Why is there no Cantonese romanization listed in this entry if this is a term used only in the Cantonese language? 204.11.184.222 16:25, 21 March 2014 (UTC)