Talk:般遷
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Dokurrat in topic RFV discussion: December 2017–February 2018
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/03/Green_check.svg/55px-Green_check.svg.png)
This entry has survived Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so.
Dokurrat (talk) 12:22, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
- Google Books have plenty of results, though I don't know how many of them are not scanno.--Zcreator (talk) 13:57, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
- @Zcreator, Dokurrat: Out of the ones that have previews, I've only found two valid ones, which I have added to the entry. BTW, if this does pass RFV, should it be a misspelling or an alternative form? — justin(r)leung { (t...) | c=› } 02:02, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
- @Justinrleung: I'm not very sure, but as Hanyu Da Zidian listed sense "搬运" under pronunciation bān of 般, I think I am a little more prefer calling it alternative form if this does pass RFV. Dokurrat (talk) 02:26, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
- @Justinrleung: Oh, Xiandai Hanyu Cidian listed sense "<书> 同“搬”" under pronunciation bān of 般, I think it would be alternative form if this does pass RFV. Dokurrat (talk) 02:30, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
- @Zcreator, Dokurrat: Out of the ones that have previews, I've only found two valid ones, which I have added to the entry. BTW, if this does pass RFV, should it be a misspelling or an alternative form? — justin(r)leung { (t...) | c=› } 02:02, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
- Rfv passed. Dokurrat (talk) 02:41, 2 February 2018 (UTC)