Failure to be verified may either mean that this information is fabricated, or is merely beyond our resources to confirm. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion. See also Wiktionary:Previously deleted entries.
Also 'its and 'ook (verb). All are questionable, as are some of the lemma forms --Mat200 03:58, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
Now tagged 'its and 'ook so that this nomination can be found.—msh210℠ (talk) 19:18, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
Easy to attest the noun sense of 'ookby searching google books:+"by ook or by". I suspect the others will be as easy if someone can think of a similarly indicative collocation.—msh210℠ (talk) 19:23, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
Eye dialect spellings of aitchless pronunciations seem likely to be common in fiction. Do we really have to cite them in every PoS? Noun 'ook is cited, IMHO. DCDuringTALK 21:08, 20 December 2010 (UTC)