Talk:Ahavians
The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process (permalink).
It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.
Vukovians[edit]
Really not convinced that these terms are suitable. --Robbie SWE (talk) 16:54, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
- The words seem to exist - but should be defined as plural of the singular. SemperBlotto (talk) 06:47, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
- Cleaned up. — SGconlaw (talk) 03:51, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Entered as English. Could be entered as an English plural of Ahavian. Is it attested per WT:ATTEST? While some people opposed sending inflected forms to RFV, they seemed to have been okay with attesting whole "segments", e.g. a whole set of plural forms, and there is usually just one plural in English; and therefore, this nomination seems ok. --Dan Polansky (talk) 12:12, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
I looked for both Ahavian and Ahavians. I could find neither in English. If this is kept, it should be with a singular Ahavian. Kiwima (talk) 23:01, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
RFV-failed Kiwima (talk) 22:36, 12 October 2017 (UTC)