Talk:Brixitus
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Latin term. Any takers? SemperBlotto (talk) 15:21, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
- Finding some Latin news sites with Brixitus, Brixitum, or Brixitu, but not many and I don't think they're durably archived... פֿינצטערניש (talk) 17:08, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
- The word is used here, here and here – but these are not independent sources. One other source: [1]. I have not looked into the question whether any of this is durably archived. Interestingly, the term also occurs in a 17th-century text, but there it is apparently a spelling error for Brixiens. --Lambiam 17:27, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
- Note that the entry creator, User:Epichaericacianus tends to make many mistakes as a newbie, e.g. inventing his own IPA transcription for certain lemmas. I've complained about some of these mistakes at the user's talk page. I think this entry should be deleted. KevinUp (talk) 17:48, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
- Speedied. I don't see anything in durably archived sources, and I wouldn't expect to. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 18:47, 20 November 2018 (UTC)