Talk:Nostradaming

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Kiwima in topic RFV discussion: May–June 2017
Jump to navigation Jump to search

RFV discussion: May–June 2017[edit]

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.


It's either a neologism or maybe even a protologism. Google gave me this and I found only three citations on Google books, of which two are "we could call it Nostradaming". Are these mentions sufficient for inclusion? --Robbie SWE (talk) 08:53, 19 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Actually, there are only two distinct citations, as the two "we could call it Nostradaming" are copies of each other: they do, however, have a genuine use later in the piece. More to the point, entry has no definition, and the two distinct quotes use the term with different meanings. Kiwima (talk) 20:34, 19 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

RFV-failed Kiwima (talk) 00:28, 20 June 2017 (UTC)Reply