Talk:ZΩ

Request for verification

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.

---

Is this unit used anywhere? I can't find any uses. -- Prince Kassad 06:23, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

See comment for zΩ above. bd2412 T 15:51, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

RFV failed, moved to RFD. —Ruakh_TALK 18:57, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

Deletion debate

The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process.

It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.

---

Failed RFV. Was discussed at Wiktionary:Beer parlour archive/2009/September#SI units and abbreviations. —Ruakh_TALK 18:57, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

• In light of the broad list of entries to which this objection applies, I have initiated a vote to exempt the entire class from the CFI at Wiktionary:Votes/2009-12/Proposed CFI exception for SI Units. Cheers! bd2412 T 20:56, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

  May as well wait for that vote to end, and "shelve" this discussion in between. Mglovesfun (talk) 20:57, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

  Since the vote failed, shouldn't the entries be deleted? -- Prince Kassad 17:08, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

  I've noted them as derived terms on Ω, Z, and z per the style I mentioned on the vote talk page so I think they ca[n] be deleted. --Bequw → τ 20:51, 8 February 2010 (UTC)