Talk:aeacid

RFV discussion: November 2022–January 2023

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.

---

aeacid

Moogsi (talk • contribs), who created Aeacid, "can't find any citations for the non-capitalised version". Note that that link is to an open RFC discussion for the term. — excarnateSojourner (talk · contrib) 02:15, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

RFV-failed This, that and the other (talk) 09:34, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

Discussion from Wiktionary:Requests for cleanup

English. Tagged by Chuck Entz in January 2020, who left the comment "Aeacidae is not a taxonomic entity", referring to the definition, "Any member of the Aeacidae". Indeed, Aeacidae is a Latin noun related to Aeacus, a figure in Greek mythology. - excarnateSojourner (talk | contrib) 06:01, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

I created Aeacid. I can't find any citations for the non-capitalised version - Moogsi (talk) 16:39, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

• @Moogsi Sent to RFV accordingly. — excarnateSojourner (talk · contrib) 02:18, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

  Thanks, I'm not too familiar with policy on this wiki - Moogsi (talk) 03:37, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

• RFV-failed. — excarnateSojourner (talk · contrib) 21:28, 25 January 2023 (UTC)