Talk:aorist
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Ioaxxere in topic RFV discussion: January–February 2023
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/48/Keep_tidy.svg/55px-Keep_tidy.svg.png)
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Noun sense 3: "gnomic aorist". (Hopelessly circular as it stands, so it needs rephrasing too, if okay.) Equinox ◑ 23:02, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
- I think this might be a broader problem of defining the term. The aorist (primarily in Ancient Greek) is a form of a verb or morphological feature. Usually it expresses the aorist aspect aka perfective, as sense 1 says. But sometimes it expresses other stuff, the "gnomic aorist" being a well-known example. Is that a separate sense of "aorist"? I doubt it: it's the same thing being applied in a different way. Just rewrite sense 1 to specify that it's a verb form and say usually it expresses the perfective aspect. —Al-Muqanna المقنع (talk) 23:13, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
RFV Failed. Ioaxxere (talk) 23:49, 4 February 2023 (UTC)