Talk:arbour

RFV discussion: July–October 2021

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.

---

arbour

Not in the MED; the OED lacks ME attestations. Hazarasp (parlement · werkis) 07:13, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

(BTW: added in diff, diff - maybe @Actarus176 has a source?)

• RFV-deleted. Those dictionaries are very thorough. —Μετάknowledge^{discuss/deeds} 01:30, 18 October 2021 (UTC)