Talk:beauty
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Equinox in topic Old physics sense: not quite right?
Does this picture show timeless beauty though? Is it relevant to the subject?
- Not in a relevant way: beauty is by definition subjective, so one should find a subject of relevant esthetic acclaim, such as an artistic prize - or pageant winner, not an individual at an irrelevant event 11:27, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Missing definitions[edit]
What about scars, black eyes and so on described as 'beauties' this seems to be missing. And the beauty meaning in the term "You beauty!"-a nickname to indicate general goodness? 2.97.163.238 07:33, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
- I'd say those are covered now. Equinox ◑ 16:00, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Old physics sense: not quite right?[edit]
We define it here as "a beauty quark", but I think instead (or perhaps in addition) it refers to the property of being a beauty quark, i.e. beauty is something a quark has. Compare charm. Equinox ◑ 16:00, 9 February 2020 (UTC)