Talk:deel en heers
Latest comment: 6 months ago by Caoimhin ceallach in topic RFV discussion: December 2020–November 2023
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Dutch, many scannos on BGC. ←₰-→ Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk) 16:49, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
- It may be archaic or obsolete: [1], [2], [3]. --Lambiam 15:45, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
- That is certainly an obsolete spelling, but I agree they are all valid uses. If this spelling isn't attested, it can be moved to that spelling.
←₰-→Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk) 11:04, 9 December 2020 (UTC)- If we were to find the full version of this book [4] we might be able to have a cite for this spelling. Thadh (talk) 09:37, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
- That is certainly an obsolete spelling, but I agree they are all valid uses. If this spelling isn't attested, it can be moved to that spelling.
- @Lingo Bingo Dingo I found one. I think most uses are puns on verdeel en heers when talking about the sharing economy, i.e. "share and rule". I don't think that counts. And I'm not sure if the quotation I found isn't one of those. What do you think? —Caoimhin ceallach (talk) 12:27, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
RFV-failed. —Caoimhin ceallach (talk) 01:04, 26 November 2023 (UTC)