Talk:diaglot

RFV discussion

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.

---

Reasonable? - but not in the OED. SemperBlotto 19:39, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Sense 3 should be likely be kept, but at Diaglott, not at this spelling or capitalization, the others I'm largely skeptical of. — Carolina wren discussió 20:35, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

1 & 2 look like misspellings of diglot. —Michael Z. 2009-04-03 20:37 z

I'm very suspicious of the "program written in two languages" sense. Equinox ◑ 19:11, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

RFV failed, entry deleted. —Ruakh_TALK 02:47, 17 November 2009 (UTC)