Talk:dizamos
Latest comment: 9 years ago by BD2412 in topic dizamos
RFD
[edit]
The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process.
It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.
"Dizamos" doesn't seem to be a legitimate conjugation of "dizer"; Portuguese Wiktionary lists the first-person affirmative imperative as "digamos", not "dizamos". A quick search online shows just a little over 2,400 results. You may see this, this, and this for more. (under imperativo → nós) The Obento Musubi (talk) 06:06, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
- @Ungoliant MMDCCLXIV, just to make sure that there isn't something weird or dialectal that could be going on. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 08:04, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. It doesn’t look like it’s attested even in dialect or nonstandard text. All but one of the Google Books hits are typos of dizemos and scannos of digamos. — Ungoliant (falai) 14:21, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
- Abstain. google books:"dizamos" gives me the following attestations: [1], [2], [3], [4], and more. Therefore, the form appears attested. google books:"dizemos" gives 3,300 hits. It is an inflected form, with low absolute number of hits, so, despite the favorable frequency ratio, I do not know whether this should be kept as a common misspelling; probably not. --Dan Polansky (talk) 12:11, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
- The four hits you listed above are in Spanish, not Portuguese. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 14:18, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted. bd2412 T 15:39, 6 September 2015 (UTC)