Talk:edito

RFC discussion: March 2014

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for cleanup.

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.

---

edito

Latin section. What's with {{la-conj-form-gloss/edo}} and {{la-conj-form-gloss/edo(2)}}? — I.S.M.E.T.A. 18:32, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

{{la-conj-form-gloss}} was deprecated and deleted a while ago after regular uses were fixed by bot/script... evidently no-one (including me) expected its subpages to be used in places this far outside of their normal range, so it speak. I've replaced the instances in edito and will now check the latest database dump for any other leftover uses of the string "la-conj-form-gloss". - -sche (discuss) 01:21, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

I think I've fixed them all. - -sche (discuss) 05:14, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

That's great. Thank you very much, -sche. — I.S.M.E.T.A. 17:24, 30 March 2014 (UTC)