Talk:inclues

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Surjection in topic RFD discussion: August–December 2020
Jump to navigation Jump to search

RFD discussion: August–December 2020

[edit]

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for deletion (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


This doesn't represent any valid inflection of incluir. The proper 2nd person singular inflection is incluis. The form "inclues" may have been valid in an old orthography, but it certainly isn't correct by current standards. --Waldyrious (talk) 16:01, 21 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Perhaps it is an obsolete spelling, just like inclue? Thadh (talk) 16:06, 21 August 2020 (UTC) I see you have already proposed this, perhaps it is then more fitting to RFV it? Thadh (talk) 16:07, 21 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
We don't delete obsolete or nonstandard spellings if they are or were in use- we just label them as such and refer the reader to the main entry. Chuck Entz (talk) 16:19, 21 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
On top of that, according to this (although perhaps not the most valid source), the second-person singular is indeed inclues. Any thoughts on that? Thadh (talk) 08:41, 22 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
That's definitely incorrect, at least for current Portuguese orthography. See for example this conjugation table from Infopédia, an online dictionary from a reputable Portuguese educational publisher (Porto Editora).
That said, looking at the talk page of inclue (thanks for the pointer, Thadh!), I agree to resolve this in the same manner, as an obsolete spelling of incluis (though I wish Ungoliant had indicated some source for the attestation). Thanks all for the comments! --Waldyrious (talk) 10:54, 22 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
I do not usually add citations when the word can be found easily on Google Books, as is the case. — Ungoliant (falai) 15:36, 24 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
Update: I have now edited inclue and inclues to include (heh) the French meanings, and created inclúe and inclúes for the Galician ones. --Waldyrious (talk) 11:59, 22 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
Withdrawn by the RFD submitter. — surjection??18:38, 17 December 2020 (UTC)Reply