Talk:læl

RFV discussion: March–May 2018

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.

---

læl

All I could find was this.__Gamren (talk) 11:35, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Well, there are a few usages of "læl" in the Usenet newsgroup "dk.test", but I wonder if those even have meaning. When I added this entry, I could've sworn I came across more usages than what I'm finding now. :( (This is one of those unfortunately failed RFV entries, among many, many others. I definitely found many usages OUTSIDE of the durably archived series on a quick search just now as well, but the durably archived ones show almost nothing. This means the term is clearly used and clearly exists, just not in durably archived media... But by our current rules, looks like this entry must be deleted.) PseudoSkull (talk) 15:52, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

What, you mean [1], [2]? Those posts do not convey any meaning.__Gamren (talk) 18:10, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

RFV failed.__Gamren (talk) 06:35, 8 May 2018 (UTC)