Talk:law of nature
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Rishabhbhat in topic RFD discussion: January 2022
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d5/TK_archive_icon.svg/55px-TK_archive_icon.svg.png)
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for deletion (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
The meaning is utterly transparent from law and nature, unlike law of cosines, law of sines etc. --Rishabhbhat (talk) 10:58, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep, I think. It appears to be a synonym of natural law in at least one sense, and there is at least one lemming, there may be others (ref added). DonnanZ (talk) 13:10, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
- I think there's a more figurative sense that is missing. It's not just used in scientific or philosophical contexts, you can also say "it's a law of nature" to mean "that's the way the world works", e.g. [1] [2] [3]. 70.172.194.25 22:11, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
- This figurative sense is represented particularly strong in its negation: not a law of nature, meaning “not a hard rule”.[4][5][6] --Lambiam 18:33, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
- It seems I was wrong, RFD-withdrawn. --Rishabhbhat (talk) 13:40, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- This figurative sense is represented particularly strong in its negation: not a law of nature, meaning “not a hard rule”.[4][5][6] --Lambiam 18:33, 20 January 2022 (UTC)