Talk:nickel and dime
This seems to also be used as a verb. I have difficulty articulating a definition for it in that sense, so someone more articulate, please add it :-)
- I've defined it as "to make progress in small increments" which could obviously use some improvement. Kappa 18:42, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
Deletion debate
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/03/Green_check.svg/55px-Green_check.svg.png)
The following information passed a request for deletion.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Noun: 15 years. nickel = 5 years (prison term); dime = 10 years. Please tell me how this is idiomatic and not straightforwardly compositional. One commonly advanced justification is that users can't know which sense of "nickel" or "dime" (or for that matter "and") might be involved. If that is so, this doesn't have to go. All we have to do is count the number of senses for each term. If at least one term has more than one sense, there is a prima facie case for inclusion. I don't know for sure what happens after that. DCDuring TALK 01:26, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
- Sounds like an inverse RfV issue to me. Can it be demonstrated that someone wouldn't say "three nickels"? If no alternative combination of words is used to effect this sentiment, then I would think that makes it idiomatic. bd2412 T 04:02, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
- The issue is not what the preferred term for a prison term of fifteen years is, but whether someone knowing that a "nickel" is a five-year term and a "dime" is a ten-year term wouldn't be able to infer that "nickel and dime" is a fifteen-year term. The line of reasoning offered implies that we should have as adjective "black and white" because statistically it is much more common than "white and black". That would seem to out-Pawley Pawley. Thanks for the novel argument. DCDuring TALK 11:01, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
- Do nickel and dime mean five and ten years, resp., when used alone? We lack those senses.—msh210℠ 18:34, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, they do. "He did a dime for felony murder." In this sense, they don't collocate with too many terms. None of the OneLook references have the sense of "nickel". DCDuring TALK 18:47, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
- Even knowing this, it's too easily confused with 15 cents. They're both coins. DAVilla 04:56, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- So, keep, right? bd2412 T 02:53, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
- Even knowing this, it's too easily confused with 15 cents. They're both coins. DAVilla 04:56, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Kept, no consensus. Mglovesfun (talk) 12:30, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
Verb
[edit]I edited the verb definition from "to charge, or be charged, several ..." to simply "to charge several...". To my ear, it is always the charger, and never the chargee, that does the nickel and diming. Note we have an example sentence that resorts to the passive voice to make the chargee the subject of the sentence - "I got nickel and dimed to death by the phone company's sneaky extra charges." To my ear it is distinctly unidiomatic to say "I nickel and dimed to death" and mean the same thing, as the previous definition would imply.