Talk:oblatrant
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Related to above, same editor who created the entry and only information about the words is that they used to be part of some dictionary but were removed. SURJECTION ·talk·contr·log· 14:58, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
RFV-failed Kiwima (talk) 20:17, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
First off, this had already failed RFV in 2018 so I'm not sure why the English entry was recreated without cits. Anyways, the two places you'll find this one are the same as the first two quotations at furibund. Other than that, it's just discussions of those. lattermint (talk) 00:41, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
- Speedied since it already failed RFV and was recreated without 3 cites. —Al-Muqanna المقنع (talk) 09:17, 27 July 2023 (UTC)