Talk:pipitsugin
Definition
[edit]@Mar vin kaiser can you verify all three senses of this word? Some IP is trying to define this from a non-free source, and calling my defs "made-up" TagaSanPedroAko (talk) 14:11, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
- I'm confused. You remove the RfV template then ask us to verifiy it - that doesn't make any sense. SemperBlotto (talk) 14:17, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
- I removed the original RFV template because it is from an IP who is trying to back this up with definitions from non-free sources, but I will add it again. -TagaSanPedroAko (talk) 14:30, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Need to verify all its senses. Some IP is trying to redefine this using the one in the Tagalog Pinoy Dictionary, where copying definitions from it constitutes a copyright violation. -TagaSanPedroAko (talk) 14:35, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
- A source being proprietary doesn't matter as to whether it can be used as a source, and copyright violations aren't what RFV is about. I'm confused about this whole thing. To be on the safe side, I've put the rfv notice back up, and am resetting the timer. If any of the senses do not have three uses in a month from now, they may be deleted. Template:pin, would you have a look at this?__Gamren (talk) 22:07, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
- RFV-deleted — surjection ⟨??⟩ 00:02, 21 July 2020 (UTC)