Talk:pluralphobia
Latest comment: 9 months ago by Lattermint in topic RFV discussion: July–November 2023
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/03/Green_check.svg/55px-Green_check.svg.png)
This entry has survived Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so.
Equinox ◑ 21:04, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- No results in Google Scholar or GB. However, it does exist in places on cyberspace, and even has some variations (solely on-web, unless I'm wrong) like "pluralphobe" and "pluralphobic". cf (talk) 21:11, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
- Sure let's do this. I've added online-only sources and now am opening a two-week discussion on whether they should count toward attestation. lattermint (talk) 23:28, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Support adding online sources. These seem to validate that the word is used. (Plus, knowing that this word has derived terms makes me feel weird saying it's fake.) CitationsFreak (talk) 01:50, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
- RFV passed. lattermint (talk) 00:20, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
- Sure let's do this. I've added online-only sources and now am opening a two-week discussion on whether they should count toward attestation. lattermint (talk) 23:28, 30 August 2023 (UTC)