Talk:posthistory

RFV discussion: November 2013–March 2014

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.

---

posthistory

Really? I can see instances of the word - but I'm not sure that the definition given is correct. SemperBlotto (talk) 14:33, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

FWIW, the Japanese translation given for that is not present in any dictionaries I have on hand, although I can find scattered uses of it. It's probably non-idiomatic because the first character is "history" and the second is a suffix meaning "after." Haplogy (話) 13:19, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

The user who created this modified prehistory at the same time. I've removed the human culture def and have added a citation of the more literal def. - -sche (discuss) 09:21, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

I RFV-failed the sense which had been RFVed (a while ago, actually). - -sche (discuss) 21:05, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

No, the sense that was rfv'ed was "The history after an event." (diff). The sense "The history after the end of human developments." was added afterwards. The latter is a feature of a politological theory mostly associated with Francis Fukuyama.__Gamren (talk) 16:49, 4 October 2017 (UTC)