Talk:róla

Hungarian

@Panda10 -- the etym currently describes this as coming from "otherwise unattested adverb ról". However, isn't this the same element as the delative case suffix -ról? ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │^{Tala við mig} 16:12, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

• @Eirikr: I updated the etymology in -ról and róla. I think both came from the ancient adverb ról. As I mentioned before, some of the Zaicz entries are very hard to understand and translate. --Panda10 (talk) 17:00, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

• @Panda10: Thank you! The etym at -ról now seems to say it's from tól / től. Is that correct? Or am I misunderstanding? ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │^{Tala við mig} 18:18, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

• @Eirikr: You mean the etym at róla, right? It doesn't say it is from -tól/-től but it is confusing because Zaicz says the Proto-Hungarian adverb ról with the meaning of -tól/-től which is a suffix. I can remove it to avoid confusion. There are times when I don't add etymology simply because the Hungarian description is too convoluted and I can't figure it out. --Panda10 (talk) 20:56, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

• Yes, sorry for my confusion, I meant róla. Thank you for the explanation and the edits.

Should this róla entry link through to -ról as well? That entry includes an inflection table, which lists róla. ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │^{Tala við mig} 23:24, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

I linked them to each other and I moved the declension to the correct entry. --Panda10 (talk) 17:31, 2 June 2018 (UTC)