Talk:things'll
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Mglovesfun in topic things'll
Deletion debate
[edit]
The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process.
It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.
Seems a lot less defensible than (deprecated template usage) it'll and slightly less than (deprecated template usage) these'll or (deprecated template usage) one'll, since (deprecated template usage) things isn't even a pronoun. To me it's more comparable with something like (deprecated template usage) Mary'll, which we probably should not be striving to include. The apostrophe denotes the "look-up break", i.e. finding (deprecated template usage) things and (deprecated template usage) 'll would not be a challenge. Equinox ◑ 23:37, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
- I like the idea of pronouns "yes", other things, including determiners and numbers "no". Pronouns "no" would be fine, too, though. Delete. "Three'll get you five that someone'll disagree." DCDuring TALK 02:27, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
- Delete, since it isn't a word, I don't know how it meets CFI. Certainly not "all words in all languages". Mglovesfun (talk) 16:45, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
Fails, deleted. Mglovesfun (talk) 23:22, 2 December 2010 (UTC)