Talk:tuyệt
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Chuck Entz in topic RFC discussion: September 2017
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for cleanup (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
The content looks dubiously similar to the Chinese entry for 絕. — justin(r)leung { (t...) | c=› } 04:17, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
- No, it looks like a word-for-word duplicate, with the senses rearranged and given POS headers (I think they changed too far-->far, but that's it). That's a copyvio and a violation of the attribution requirements of our license. It's also outrageous to be adding a whole entry in a language that's not even in their Babel as one they speak using this kind of crude fakery to fill in the blanks. This is part of a pattern where they add something, then think about whether it was a good idea, and not much different from their practice of making mass edits from sources that they don't understand very well.
- I've deleted the entry as a copyvio and blocked them for 3 days. I have a hunch they're too young to understand what they're doing, or it would have been much longer. Chuck Entz (talk) 04:55, 3 September 2017 (UTC)