Talk:use-mention distinctions
Latest comment: 6 years ago by SemperBlotto in topic RFV discussion: December 2017
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/48/Keep_tidy.svg/55px-Keep_tidy.svg.png)
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Tagged but not listed.
- Why is this tagged at all? We do not usually require separate verification of regular plural forms, unless questioning whether a plural exists at all. In the entry for use-mention distinction, the citation uses the plural form, so it obviously exists. Kiwima (talk) 12:13, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
- Tag removed. SemperBlotto (talk) 06:43, 27 December 2017 (UTC)